According to the Greek, a positive answer is expected to the question (see on ch. 6:39). The lesson of the parable is based on the striking contrast between the character of the unjust judge and a just, merciful God. If the judge, for selfish reasons, would eventually respond to the widow‘s request, how much more will God respond to those who address their petitions to Him. For a similar contrast see on Matt. 15:26, 27. If persistence with an unrighteous judge brings results, certainly the same virtue will not pass unnoticed and unrewarded by a righteous God.

 That is, His “chosen” ones (see Ps. 105:6, 43; Isa. 43:20; 65:15).

 That is, continuously, or persistently (see on v. 1). Compare the cry for justice of the “souls” John saw “under the altar” (Rev. 6:9, 10).

 It may often seem to “his own elect” that God is delaying His answer (see Hab. 1:2), while all the time He is actually working “speedily.” He sets in operation those forces that will accomplish His good will for the “elect,” and these forces may be in operation long before the results become apparent. Furthermore, God may at times delay “avenging” His “elect” in order that those who are persecuting them may have time and opportunity to repent. God loves the persecutors as well as the persecuted; He is “not slack concerning his promise,” yet at the same time He is “not willing that any should perish” (2 Peter 3:9). Furthermore, character is made perfect through trial (see on Job 23:10), and God may at times delay answering our petitions in order that opportunity may be afforded for the development of character (see DA 200; COL 175, 177). Delay also avails to intensify our sense of need, without which it is often impossible for God to work for us (see COL 152). For God‘s attitude toward His “elect” who suffer unjustly, and for the attitude they should take under such circumstances, see 1 Peter 2:20-24.