1 H. D. Preuss,
Jahweglaube und Zukunftserwartung,
BWANT 7 (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag, 1964), 205-214 쪽을 특별히 참조하라. 카이저는 모든 구약은 계속 확대되지만 지속적인 하나의 핵심 즉 하나님의 약속에 집중된다는 사실을 보여주었다. 27. W. C. Kaiser, Jr.
Toward an Old Testament Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1978).
2 C. T. Fritsch,
“Principles of Biblical Typology,” BSac 104(1947): 214.
3 Ibid., 230.
4 Ibid., 215.
5 L. Goppelt. Typos.
Die Typotogische Deutung des Alten Testaments im Neuen (Darmstadt: Wissensch. Buchg., 1969; 1939판 재판), 286, 240을 비교하라. R. T. France, Jesus and the Old Testarrient (London: Tyndale, 1971), 제3장 참조.
6 Goppelt,
Typos, 239-249 참조.
7 Ibid., 239.
8 Ryrie (
The Basis of the Premillerinial Faith, 43)는
“이스라엘은 교회를 표상한다”고 인정하였다.
9 C. T. Fritsch,
“Biblical Typology: Typological Interpretation in the New Testament,” BSac 104 (1946): 87-100을 참조하라.
10 H. Mueller in
NIDNIT, vol. 3, 905. E. E. Ellis는 신약에 나타난 더 큰
“심판 표상학”에 대해 언급하였다.
Prophecy and Hemmeneutics in Early Cinstianity (Grand Rapids, MI.: Eerdmans, 1978), 168.
11 P. Fairbairn,
The Typology of Scripture, vol. 2 (Grand Rapids, M: Baker Book House, 1975; 1900년판 재판), 65, E. E. Ellis (
Prophecy and Hermeneutics in Early Christianity, V. 166)는
“언약의 표상은 구약 전체를 예언으로 접근한다”고 하였다.
12
TDNT, vol. 8, 258.
13 C T. Fritsch,
“To ‘Antitypon’,” in
Studia Biblica et Semitica, Festschrift for Th. C. Vriezen; W. C. van Unnik, ed. (Wageningen: H. Veenman, 1966), 101.
14 Ladd, The Last Things, 18. 또한 F. F. Bruce,
New Testarment Developments of Old Testament Themes (Grand Rapids, M: Eerdmans, 1970), 79.
15 비교하라. S. Kistemaker,
The Psalm Citations in the Epistle to the Hebrews (Amsterdam: G. van Soest, 1961), 132. LOL H. T. Kraus,
Psalmen, BKAT XV/2 (Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1972), 752-764.
16 C H Dodd,
According to the Scriptures: The Substructure of New Testament Theology (London: Nisbet, 1952), 35. 비교하라. 시편 110편의 인덱스를 참고하라. The Greek New Testament, K. Aland, 5 (London: United Bible Society,1966), 908.
17 J. F. Walvoord는 H A Ironside를 인용한다.
“하나님의 프로그램 안에 있 는 소위 간격과 휴지들은 시편 110.1과 110-2 사이에 있는 일이다.” (
BSac 101 [1944]:47).
18 새 스코필드 주석 성경(NSRB)은 요한계시록 3:21에 대해 이 구절은
“그리스 도께서 지금 그 자신의 보좌에 앉지 않으셨으며” (1355쪽), 고로 다윗 언약과
“메시아 왕국은 그 성취를 기다리고 있다” (1355-1356쪽)고 결론을 내린다고 주석하였다.
19 Goppelt, TDNT, vol. 8, 259.
20 F. Foulkes,
The Acts of God: A Study of the Basis of Typology in the Old Testarment (London: Tyndale, 1955)를 참조하라.
21 France.
Jesus and the Old Testament, 43.
22 Goppelt,
Typos, 244, 277.
23 S. Kistemaker의 학위 논문
The Psalm Citations in the Epistle to the Hebrews (Free University, Amsterdam, 1961; 19614 G. van Soest에 의해 Amsterdam에서 출판)는 표상학에서의 이러한 회고적 경향을 확인하였다.
“히브리서의 저자는 오직 구약의 성취라는 빛 아래서만 성경 구절들을 해석하였다”(90쪽).
24 Bright,
The Authority of the Old Testament, 92.. France,
Jesus and the Old Testament, 41-42., Foulkes, The Acts of God, 38-40.
25 Foulkes,
The Acts of God, 38, 39.
26 R. C. Dentan,
“Typology-Its Use and Abuse,” Anglican Theological Review 34 (1952): 211-217 (215).
27 G. W. H. Lampe.
“Typological Exegesis,” Theology 16 (1953): 201-208.
28 Jean Daniélou,
Sacramentum Futuri. Etudes sur les Originesde la Typotogie Biblique (Paris: Beauchesne. 1950), 52, 143.
29 Thomas Aquinas,
Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dom. Prov. (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1947), la, q, 1, art. 10. 977121. Robert A. Markus,
“Presuppositions of the Typological Approach to Scripture,” Church Quarterly Review 158 (1957); 442451. Also Jean Danielou,
Dieu Vivant, 151, as quoted by W, Eichrodt,
“Is Typological Exegesis an Appropriate Method?” in EOTH, 242. E. C Blackman,
“Return of Typology?”,
Congressional Quarterly 32 (1954): 53-59. Oscar Cullmann,
Salvaion in History (New York: Harper, 1967), 133.
30 H. W. Wolff,
“The Hermeneutics of the Old Testament,” in
EOTH, 189.
31 D. A. Hagner,
“The Old Testament in the New Testament,” in
Interpreting the Word of God, ed. S. J. Schultz and M. B. Inch (Chicago: Moody Press, 1976), 94.
32 D. L. Baker,
“Typology and the Christian Use of the Old Testament,” Scothish Jourmal of Theology 29 (1976): 137-157 (155).
33 Davidson,
Old Testament Prophecy, 229.
34 Barnabus의 서신에서처럼 (Coppelt,
Typos, 245-248 참조), Cocceian 학파의 것은 Fairbaim,
The Typology of Scripture, vol. 1, 1-14를 참조하라.
35 Ramm,
Protestant Biblical Interpretation, 229. 36 Ibid.
37 Gerhard F. Hasel,
New Testament Theology: Basic Issues in Debate (Grand Rapids, M: Eerdmans, 1978), 190-193.
38 Chafer,
Systematic Theology, vol. 4, 137.
39 Ibid. 40 Ibid., vol. 5, 348. 41 Ibid., vol. 4, 142.
42 The NSRB는
“아론과 그의 아들들은 교회 시대의 그리스도와 신자들을 표 상한다” (계 1:6; 벧전 29 참조)고 하였다. 106, 107쪽.
43 Ryrie,
Dispensationalism Today, 149, 154, 190.
44 Ibid., 144, 150.
45 Charles F. Baker,
A Dispensational Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Grace Bible College Pub., 1972), 470, 500, 508, 527, 655. 그는 이스라엘 민족 가운데 있는 영적 이스라엘도 구약의
‘교회’ 즉
‘이스라엘인 교회’라고 주장하였다.
46 Ibid., 471, 497-500.
47 Ibid., 471.
48 W. Eichrodt,
“Is Typological Exegesis an Appropriate Method?”, in
EOTH, 226. 1
49 See H. W. Wolff,
“The Old Testament in Controversy: Interpretive Principles and Illustration.” Interpretation 12 (1958):281-91.
50 다음을 참조하라. Foulkes,
The Acts of God. Danielou,
Sacramernhun Futuri; 영역판은
From Shadous lo Reality (Westminster, Md.: Newman, 1960). S. Amsler,
“Prophetie et Typologie,” Revuede Theol. et de Phil. 3 (1953): 139–148.
51 Foulkes,
The Acts of God, 23-33. Goppelt,
TDNT, vol. 8, 254. Fritsch,
“Biblical Typology.” 91-100.
52 Danielou,
Sacramentum Futuri, 4.
53 비교하라. Markus,
“Presuppositions of the Typological Approach too Scripture,” 442-451. S. Amsler,
“Prophetie et Typologie,” 139-148.
54 Goppelt,
TDNT, vol. 8, 254.
55 Ibid. 비교하라. Foulkes,
The Acts of God, 22, 32. G. W. H. Lampe,
“Herineneutics and Typology,” London Quarterly and Holburn Review 190 (1965):17-23.
56 W. Zimmerli,
“Promise and Fulfillment,” in
EOTH, 106-107.
57 Fritsch,
“Principles of Biblical Typology,” BSac 104(1947): 215. 비교하라 Art Moorehead,
“Type,” in
ISBE, vol. 5.
58 S. N. Gundry,
“Typology as a Means of Interpretation: Pastand Present,” JETS 12(1969): 233-240(237). 비교하라. Fritsch,
“Biblical Typology,” 90. Terry,
Biblical Hermeneutics, 248. Berkhof,
Principles of Biblical Interpretation, 144-145.
59 H. D. Hummel,
“The Old Testament Basis of Typological Interpretation.” Biblical Research 9(1964): 38-50(49).
60 Lampe,
“Hermeneutics and Typology,” 24.
61 다음을 참고하라. B. W. Anderson,
“Exodus Typology in Second Isaiah,” in
Israel’s Prophetic Heritage, ed. B. W. Anderson and W. Harrelson(New York: Harper, 1962), 제12장.
62 Eichrodt,
“Is Typological Exegesis an Appropriate Method?”, in
EOTH, 234. mö127. Ramm,
Protestant Biblical Interpretation, 239.
63 다음을 참조하라. T. Boersma,
Is the Bible a jigsaw Puzzle? An Evaluation of Hal Lindsey’s Writings(St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada: Paideia Press, 1978).
64 Goppelt, Tppos, 248. 비교하라 그의 논문
“Apokalypik und Typologiebei Paulus,” ThLZ 89(1964): 321-344; 또한
Typos, 259-299. Ellis,
Prophecy and Hermeneutics in Earty Christianity, 168-169. R. H. Smith,
“Exodus Typology in the Fourth Gospel,” JBL 81(1962): 324-342. M. D. Coulder,
Type and History in Acts(London:S.P.C.K, 1964), #
17,
“The Typological Method.” R. E. Nixon,
The Exodus in The New Testarment(London: Tyndale, 1962), 29, 32. 다음의 연구도 매우 중요하다. R. M. Davidson,
Typology in Scriphure, Andrews University Seminary Doctoral Dissertation Series, Vol. 2(Berrien Springs, Mich: Andrews University Press, 1981), 396-408.